Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Bond's avatar

I really appreciate Roots2Words. Thank you very much for all your work.

One quibble: It would be more accurate to say that standardized reading exams *claim* to assess advanced language skills. It is certainly very questionable whether any multiple choice game (such as the S.A.T.) can assess our skills in reading and writing, especially at a more advanced level, when reading and writing become much more subjective activities.

Again thank you for Roots2Words.

Matthew Bond's avatar

I agree, Mike, that we need to define our terms. You began by asserting that the S.A.T. assesses "advanced language skills," but now, you imply that a high-school class discussing Emily Dickinson has gone beyond "advanced language skills" and has plunged into "deep literary analysis." Considering that there isn't a high-school student in the U.S.A. who cannot appreciate Dickinson's work, I would like definitions and examples of these terms.

Yes, the S.A.T. has a few questions testing vocabulary knowledge (which I would describe as outside knowledge), but the reading & writing questions are predominantly assessing an ability to play the S.A.T. game, not skills in reading comprehension and certainly not advanced language skills, since a right/wrong multiple-choice game is antithetical to the multifarity of meanings in language.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?